IN THE NAME OF ALLAHTHE MOST COMPASSOINATE AND THE MOST MERCIFULOnce you hear of some news, do ponder around it. (Contemplating for fulfillment) Amir-el-momenin, Imam Ali (God's praise be upon him)Greetings shall be upon the conquering spirit of the great Imam, who taught us the lesson of assertive Islam, and the final combat.As it was observed by you and us that in Bahrain's events, the sages' declarations, the media efforts, and the hope of the nations bore no result and our beloved Bahrain somewhat remained under the invasion of the aggressors. And upon a Shiite nation rule a handful of unwise and incompetent individuals and ultimately a group of Zionists.Peace is a divine word, however, at the time when the territories of the Iranian nation is remaining under the occupation of the Zionist invaders, what kind of meaning and perception does this peace have?They took over our lands, dividing our country's soil. Where the holy Quran and the descendants of the holy prophet ought to govern, the injustice and the ideology of the Zionists is ruling, yet again "peace" is mentioned. What kind of peace is it that is always demanding persistence upon it? Is it ever possible for the man to think of peace while the Zionism exhales? Is it ever possible for the territories of a nation to be under the occupation of invaders, and such nation being thinking of peace? The former Jalghaveh state of Iran or the United Arab Emirates of today, under the umbrella of the Arab Union states: In order to maintain our brotherhood, it is for Iran to give the United Arab Emirates the three islands. Could one imagine that such statements are due to the ignorance of their speakers? Never ever!The Northern Azerbaijan (the modern day country of the Republic of Azerbaijan and previously a Soviet Union's state) which is considered to be one fifth of the Iranian territory being annexed in Ghafghaz, lays the claim of ownership on 9 states such as Ardabil, Tabriz, Kurdistan, Hamadan, Zanjan, Mazandaran, Gilan, and Qazvin of our Islamic Iran. This means that this country, in its government books including the schools' educational textbooks, names Iran as an invader. Its president officially is a claimer of Iran's territory and this has expanded to such extent that the country's students in their meeting with the president of the Republic of Azerbaijan question: What is the future to the territories which have been invaded by the occupying Iran?This is the situation with a country, a system, and a government which is itself the subject of being under the claim, positing a claim on the land against the Islamic Republic of Iran. However, this problem is not specific to the Northern Azerbaijan and the state of Jalghaveh (Presently, the United Arab Emirates) has also the similar situation. You put forth this question that for how many thousands of years has Bahrain been the territory of Iran, being separated from Iran because of the incompetence of the second Pahlavi King. In fact, what did that high ranking authority within the Islamic Republic system, behind whom no one gave support, state? Did he say that Saudi Arabia belongs to us? Did he claim that Mecca and Medina are ours? Or did he make the claim that Iraq, Najaf, Kazemain, Samera, or Egypt and Jordan to be ours? He said that Bahrain was ours, not that it is now and see for yourselves what these pseudo humans did! Their media reflected: "… that it can not be done to stay silent until the Arab nations find new owners on the daily basis". Is Bahrain that Arab nation for which Iran is to be its new proprietor? Do we have an Arabic Bahrain in principles? What is the reason for such great animosity from the pseudo humans in the guise of the so-called international organizations against Iran? And why mustn't the Iranian show any sensitivity towards the 200 years of looting, annexation, and occupation of many million square kilometers of its lost territory by the hands of its Zionist foes? Isn't the reunification of over 6 million square kilometers of the lost land, invaded by the occupiers, back to the country's territory, a historical prophecy for the Iranian race? If we are to scrutinize the problem relating to Iran's lost territories with great vision and rational, we notice transparently that the enemies of Iran are much more persistent on their non-existing rights than we are on our own existing ones, and a more fundamental issue is this that instead of us, our foes have become the aggressors. This is one arrow whose direction must be deflected with the wisdom of god almighty. And it is quite appropriate for our media, to the extent that the false claimers desiring the annihilation of our Iran, entering the global field of mass media, and ever onward being the front advocates demanding the legal rights for the international prestige of Iran and the Iranian.Yesterday, Gorchakov, Palmer stone, and people like them were saying: "We won't allow Iran's territory to expand greater what it is now". And today the Zionist Brizhinski is saying: "We won't let the Iranian Empire to be resurrected" or the Zionist Kerdsman is saying:" Iran must not be given the permission to control the region". This is all in the foreign arena but in the domestic arena; the international Zionist hands and their internal mercenaries also from behind the curtains are trying efforts to accelerate and augment potato chips, the Coca Cola drinks, beauty accessories, modes of perversion, self-generated fashions, cultural intrusions and incursions, soccer matches and amusements, draining and emptying the Islamic society out of motivations, and etc as well as using their power to the fullest in creating indifferent spectators.
به نام خدا